CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung Digimax 200
vs Samsung Digimax 210 SE

Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax 200

Samsung / 2002

Digimax 200

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax 210 SE

Samsung / 2000

Digimax 210 SE

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Digimax 200
21 mm²
Digimax 210 SE
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Digimax 200 and Digimax 210 SE have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Digimax 200MetricDigimax 210 SE
2.11 MPEffective pixels2.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.18 µmPixel pitch3.19 µm
10.1 µm²Pixel area10.15 µm²
9.9 MP/cm²Pixel density9.85 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
215 gWeight340 g
SmartMediaStorageCompactFlash type I
2x AAABattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Digimax 200 and Digimax 210 SE have the same sensor area. The Digimax 200 has the lighter body. The Digimax 200 has the higher effective resolution. The Digimax 200 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Digimax 200

Released in 2002, Digimax 200 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 215 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digimax 210 SE

Released in 2000, Digimax 210 SE has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 340 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras