Reasons to choose RCP-7324
Released in 2007, RCP-7324 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7 MP effective resolution, and a 136 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei RCP-7324
vs Rollei X-8 Compact
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
RCP-732425 mm²
X-8 Compact- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The RCP-7324 and X-8 Compact have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
RCP-7324MetricX-8 Compact
7 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.88 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
3.55 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
28.18 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
136 gWeight115 g
Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The RCP-7324 and X-8 Compact have the same sensor area. The X-8 Compact has the lighter body. The X-8 Compact has the higher effective resolution. The X-8 Compact is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose X-8 Compact
Released in 2008, X-8 Compact has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.