Reasons to choose Powerflex 600
Released in 2011, Powerflex 600 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Powerflex 600
vs Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Powerflex 60028 mm²
Sportsline 60 Camouflage- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Powerflex 600 and Sportsline 60 Camouflage have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Powerflex 600MetricSportsline 60 Camouflage
14 MPEffective pixels5 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch2.39 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area5.69 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density17.57 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight98 g
SDHC, SDXC, Secure DigitalStoragemicroSD, microSDHC
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AAA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Powerflex 600 and Sportsline 60 Camouflage have the same sensor area. The Sportsline 60 Camouflage has the lighter body. The Powerflex 600 has the higher effective resolution. The Powerflex 600 and Sportsline 60 Camouflage were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Sportsline 60 Camouflage
Released in 2011, Sportsline 60 Camouflage has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 98 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.