CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Flexline 140
vs Rollei RCP-10325X

Archive illustration for Rollei Flexline 140

Rollei / 2008

Flexline 140

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei RCP-10325X

Rollei / 2007

RCP-10325X

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Flexline 140
38 mm²
RCP-10325X
Area ratio
1.37:1
Absolute difference
10 mm²
Relative difference
36.7%

The RCP-10325X has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Flexline 140MetricRCP-10325X
10 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor7.11 × 5.33
1.67 µmPixel pitch1.95 µm
2.77 µm²Pixel area3.79 µm²
36.07 MP/cm²Pixel density26.39 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
126 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The RCP-10325X has the larger sensor area. The RCP-10325X has the lighter body. The Flexline 140 and RCP-10325X have the same effective resolution. The Flexline 140 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Flexline 140

Released in 2008, Flexline 140 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 126 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose RCP-10325X

Released in 2007, RCP-10325X has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras