Reasons to choose dp 3210
Released in 2003, dp 3210 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 310 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei dp 3210
vs Rollei dt 4000
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
dp 321025 mm²
dt 4000- Area ratio
- 1.17:1
- Absolute difference
- 4 mm²
- Relative difference
- 16.5%
The dt 4000 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
dp 3210Metricdt 4000
3.2 MPEffective pixels4.23 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.58 µmPixel pitch2.42 µm
6.66 µm²Pixel area5.87 µm²
15.01 MP/cm²Pixel density17.03 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
310 gWeight185 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x CR-V3, 4x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The dt 4000 has the larger sensor area. The dt 4000 has the lighter body. The dt 4000 has the higher effective resolution. The dp 3210 and dt 4000 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose dt 4000
Released in 2003, dt 4000 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.23 MP effective resolution, and a 185 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.