CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei dp 300
vs Rollei dp 3210

Archive illustration for Rollei dp 300

Rollei / 2003

dp 300

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei dp 3210

Rollei / 2003

dp 3210

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
dp 300
21 mm²
dp 3210
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The dp 300 and dp 3210 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

dp 300Metricdp 3210
3.1 MPEffective pixels3.2 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.62 µmPixel pitch2.58 µm
6.88 µm²Pixel area6.66 µm²
14.54 MP/cm²Pixel density15.01 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
190 gWeight310 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x CR-V3, 4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dp 300 and dp 3210 have the same sensor area. The dp 300 has the lighter body. The dp 3210 has the higher effective resolution. The dp 300 and dp 3210 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose dp 300

Released in 2003, dp 300 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 190 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose dp 3210

Released in 2003, dp 3210 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 310 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras