CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei dk4010
vs Rollei dpx 310

Archive illustration for Rollei dk4010

Rollei / 2005

dk4010

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei dpx 310

Rollei / 2005

dpx 310

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
dk4010
21 mm²
dpx 310
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The dk4010 and dpx 310 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

dk4010Metricdpx 310
4 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.31 µmPixel pitch2.62 µm
5.33 µm²Pixel area6.88 µm²
18.76 MP/cm²Pixel density14.54 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
350 gWeight160 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
4x AABattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dk4010 and dpx 310 have the same sensor area. The dpx 310 has the lighter body. The dk4010 has the higher effective resolution. The dk4010 and dpx 310 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose dk4010

Released in 2005, dk4010 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 350 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose dpx 310

Released in 2005, dpx 310 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras