CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei dcx 400
vs Rollei Prego dp5300

Archive illustration for Rollei dcx 400

Rollei / 2004

dcx 400

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Prego dp5300

Rollei / 2004

Prego dp5300

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
dcx 400
38 mm²
Prego dp5300
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The dcx 400 and Prego dp5300 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

dcx 400MetricPrego dp5300
4 MPEffective pixels5.25 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.08 µmPixel pitch2.69 µm
9.47 µm²Pixel area7.22 µm²
10.56 MP/cm²Pixel density13.85 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
150 gWeight180 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dcx 400 and Prego dp5300 have the same sensor area. The dcx 400 has the lighter body. The Prego dp5300 has the higher effective resolution. The dcx 400 and Prego dp5300 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose dcx 400

Released in 2004, dcx 400 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Prego dp5300

Released in 2004, Prego dp5300 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.25 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras