Reasons to choose dcx 310
Released in 2005, dcx 310 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei dcx 310
vs Rollei dk4010
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
dcx 31021 mm²
dk4010- Area ratio
- 1.78:1
- Absolute difference
- 17 mm²
- Relative difference
- 77.8%
The dcx 310 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
dcx 310Metricdk4010
3.1 MPEffective pixels4 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor5.33 × 4
3.5 µmPixel pitch2.31 µm
12.22 µm²Pixel area5.33 µm²
8.18 MP/cm²Pixel density18.76 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
150 gWeight350 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery4x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The dcx 310 has the larger sensor area. The dcx 310 has the lighter body. The dk4010 has the higher effective resolution. The dcx 310 and dk4010 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose dk4010
Released in 2005, dk4010 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 350 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.