CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei dcx 310
vs Rollei dcx 400

Archive illustration for Rollei dcx 310

Rollei / 2005

dcx 310

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei dcx 400

Rollei / 2004

dcx 400

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
dcx 310
38 mm²
dcx 400
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The dcx 310 and dcx 400 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

dcx 310Metricdcx 400
3.1 MPEffective pixels4 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.5 µmPixel pitch3.08 µm
12.22 µm²Pixel area9.47 µm²
8.18 MP/cm²Pixel density10.56 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
150 gWeight150 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The dcx 310 and dcx 400 have the same sensor area. The dcx 310 and dcx 400 have the same body weight. The dcx 400 has the higher effective resolution. The dcx 310 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose dcx 310

Released in 2005, dcx 310 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose dcx 400

Released in 2004, dcx 400 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras