Reasons to choose da5324
Released in 2005, da5324 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5.19 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei da5324
vs Rollei dpx 310
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
da532421 mm²
dpx 310- Area ratio
- 1.17:1
- Absolute difference
- 4 mm²
- Relative difference
- 16.5%
The da5324 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
da5324Metricdpx 310
5.19 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.33 × 4
2.19 µmPixel pitch2.62 µm
4.79 µm²Pixel area6.88 µm²
20.89 MP/cm²Pixel density14.54 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight160 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The da5324 has the larger sensor area. The da5324 has the lighter body. The da5324 has the higher effective resolution. The da5324 and dpx 310 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose dpx 310
Released in 2005, dpx 310 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.