CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei d23 com
vs Rollei d33 com

Archive illustration for Rollei d23 com

Rollei / 2001

d23 com

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei d33 com

Rollei / 2001

d33 com

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
d23 com
38 mm²
d33 com
Area ratio
1.12:1
Absolute difference
5 mm²
Relative difference
12.1%

The d23 com has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

d23 comMetricd33 com
2.3 MPEffective pixels3.31 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.3 µmPixel pitch3.38 µm
18.46 µm²Pixel area11.45 µm²
5.42 MP/cm²Pixel density8.73 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
370 gWeight280 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
4x AABattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The d23 com has the larger sensor area. The d33 com has the lighter body. The d33 com has the higher effective resolution. The d23 com and d33 com were both released in 2001. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose d23 com

Released in 2001, d23 com has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 2.3 MP effective resolution, and a 370 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose d33 com

Released in 2001, d33 com has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.31 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras