CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Compactline 81
vs Samsung D860

Archive illustration for Rollei Compactline 81

Rollei / 2010

Compactline 81

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung D860

Samsung / 2008

D860

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Compactline 81
25 mm²
D860
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Compactline 81 and D860 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Compactline 81MetricD860
8 MPEffective pixels8.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.75 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area3.07 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density32.61 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
82 gWeight123 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AAABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Compactline 81 and D860 have the same sensor area. The Compactline 81 has the lighter body. The D860 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 81 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Compactline 81

Released in 2010, Compactline 81 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 82 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D860

Released in 2008, D860 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8.1 MP effective resolution, and a 123 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras