Reasons to choose Compactline 80
Released in 2008, Compactline 80 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Compactline 80
vs Rollei da6324
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
Compactline 8025 mm²
da6324- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Compactline 80 and da6324 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Compactline 80Metricda6324
8 MPEffective pixels6.36 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.98 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area3.91 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density25.6 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight140 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compactline 80 and da6324 have the same sensor area. The Compactline 80 and da6324 have the same body weight. The Compactline 80 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 80 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose da6324
Released in 2006, da6324 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6.36 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.