Reasons to choose Compactline 52
Released in 2010, Compactline 52 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 95 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Compactline 52
vs Rollei Sportsline 50
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Compactline 5228 mm²
Sportsline 50- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Compactline 52 and Sportsline 50 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Compactline 52MetricSportsline 50
5 MPEffective pixels5 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
2.39 µmPixel pitch2.39 µm
5.69 µm²Pixel area5.69 µm²
17.57 MP/cm²Pixel density17.57 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
95 gWeight98 g
microSDStoragemicroSD
2x AAABattery2x AAA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compactline 52 and Sportsline 50 have the same sensor area. The Compactline 52 has the lighter body. The Compactline 52 and Sportsline 50 have the same effective resolution. The Compactline 52 and Sportsline 50 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Sportsline 50
Released in 2010, Sportsline 50 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 98 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.