Reasons to choose Compactline 415
Released in 2011, Compactline 415 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Compactline 415
vs Rollei Powerflex 500
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Compactline 41528 mm²
Powerflex 500- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Compactline 415 and Powerflex 500 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Compactline 415MetricPowerflex 500
14 MPEffective pixels16 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.41 µmPixel pitch1.32 µm
1.98 µm²Pixel area1.73 µm²
50.5 MP/cm²Pixel density57.71 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight113 g
SD/SDHCStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Alkaline batteries, 2x 1.5 V AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compactline 415 and Powerflex 500 have the same sensor area. The Powerflex 500 has the lighter body. The Powerflex 500 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 415 and Powerflex 500 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Powerflex 500
Released in 2011, Powerflex 500 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 113 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.