Reasons to choose Compactline 304
Released in 2011, Compactline 304 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Compactline 304
vs Rollei Powerflex 400
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Compactline 30428 mm²
Powerflex 400- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Compactline 304 and Powerflex 400 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Compactline 304MetricPowerflex 400
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.41 µmPixel pitch1.41 µm
1.98 µm²Pixel area1.98 µm²
50.5 MP/cm²Pixel density50.5 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
114 gWeight104 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compactline 304 and Powerflex 400 have the same sensor area. The Powerflex 400 has the lighter body. The Compactline 304 and Powerflex 400 have the same effective resolution. The Compactline 304 and Powerflex 400 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Powerflex 400
Released in 2011, Powerflex 400 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 104 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.