Reasons to choose Compactline 202
Released in 2009, Compactline 202 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Compactline 202
vs Rollei Flexline 140
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Compactline 20228 mm²
Flexline 140- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Compactline 202 and Flexline 140 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Compactline 202MetricFlexline 140
12 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.52 µmPixel pitch1.67 µm
2.31 µm²Pixel area2.77 µm²
43.28 MP/cm²Pixel density36.07 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
110 gWeight126 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compactline 202 and Flexline 140 have the same sensor area. The Compactline 202 has the lighter body. The Compactline 202 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 202 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Flexline 140
Released in 2008, Flexline 140 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 126 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.