CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Compactline 100
vs Rollei RCP-10325X

Archive illustration for Rollei Compactline 100

Rollei / 2008

Compactline 100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei RCP-10325X

Rollei / 2007

RCP-10325X

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Compactline 100
38 mm²
RCP-10325X
Area ratio
1.33:1
Absolute difference
9 mm²
Relative difference
33.2%

The RCP-10325X has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Compactline 100MetricRCP-10325X
10 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor7.11 × 5.33
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.95 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area3.79 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density26.39 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
—BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The RCP-10325X has the larger sensor area. The RCP-10325X has the lighter body. The Compactline 100 and RCP-10325X have the same effective resolution. The Compactline 100 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Compactline 100

Released in 2008, Compactline 100 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose RCP-10325X

Released in 2007, RCP-10325X has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras