CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh RDC-6000
vs Ricoh RDC-7

Archive illustration for Ricoh RDC-6000

Ricoh / 2000

RDC-6000

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh RDC-7

Ricoh / 2000

RDC-7

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
RDC-6000
38 mm²
RDC-7
Area ratio
1.23:1
Absolute difference
7 mm²
Relative difference
23.4%

The RDC-7 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

RDC-6000MetricRDC-7
1.9 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.02 µmPixel pitch3.5 µm
16.17 µm²Pixel area12.22 µm²
6.18 MP/cm²Pixel density8.18 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
260 gWeight320 g
SmartMediaStorageSmartMedia
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The RDC-7 has the larger sensor area. The RDC-6000 has the lighter body. The RDC-7 has the higher effective resolution. The RDC-6000 and RDC-7 were both released in 2000. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose RDC-6000

Released in 2000, RDC-6000 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose RDC-7

Released in 2000, RDC-7 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras