CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh R10
vs Ricoh R50

Archive illustration for Ricoh R10

Ricoh / 2008

R10

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh R50

Ricoh / 2008

R50

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
R10
28 mm²
R50
Area ratio
1.03:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
2.6%

The R10 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

R10MetricR50
10 MPEffective pixels10.34 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.64 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area2.68 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density37.3 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
190 gWeight116 g
Internal storageStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion (DB-70) Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The R10 has the larger sensor area. The R50 has the lighter body. The R50 has the higher effective resolution. The R10 and R50 were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose R10

Released in 2008, R10 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 190 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose R50

Released in 2008, R50 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.34 MP effective resolution, and a 116 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras