CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh GR
vs Samsung NX30

Archive illustration for Ricoh GR

Ricoh / 2013

GR

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung NX30

Samsung / 2014

NX30

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

371 mm²
GR
369 mm²
NX30
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
2 mm²
Relative difference
0.4%

The GR has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

GRMetricNX30
16.2 MPEffective pixels20.3 MP
23.6 × 15.7Sensor23.5 × 15.7
4.78 µmPixel pitch4.26 µm
22.87 µm²Pixel area18.17 µm²
4.37 MP/cm²Pixel density5.5 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
—Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
245 gWeight375 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Rechargeable DB-65 lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryBP1410 (1410mAh)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The GR has the larger sensor area. The GR has the lighter body. The NX30 has the higher effective resolution. The NX30 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose GR

Released in 2013, GR has about 371 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 245 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose NX30

Released in 2014, NX30 has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 20.3 MP effective resolution, and a 375 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras