Reasons to choose GR
Released in 2013, GR has about 371 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 245 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Ricoh GR
vs Samsung NX1
VS
Sensor area
371 mm²
GR369 mm²
NX1- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 2 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0.4%
The GR has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
GRMetricNX1
16.2 MPEffective pixels28.2 MP
23.6 × 15.7Sensor23.5 × 15.7
4.78 µmPixel pitch3.62 µm
22.87 µm²Pixel area13.08 µm²
4.37 MP/cm²Pixel density7.64 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
—Maximum video4,096 × 2,160
245 gWeight550 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC/UHS-I/UHS-II
Rechargeable DB-65 lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryBP-1900
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The GR has the larger sensor area. The GR has the lighter body. The NX1 has the higher effective resolution. The NX1 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose NX1
Released in 2014, NX1 has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 28.2 MP effective resolution, and a 550 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.