Reasons to choose Caplio RR330
Released in 2004, Caplio RR330 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Ricoh Caplio RR330
vs Ricoh Caplio RX
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
Caplio RR33021 mm²
Caplio RX- Area ratio
- 1.17:1
- Absolute difference
- 4 mm²
- Relative difference
- 16.5%
The Caplio RR330 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Caplio RR330MetricCaplio RX
3.34 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.33 × 4
2.73 µmPixel pitch2.62 µm
7.44 µm²Pixel area6.88 µm²
13.45 MP/cm²Pixel density14.54 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight165 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
1x CR-V3, 2x AABatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Caplio RR330 has the larger sensor area. The Caplio RR330 has the lighter body. The Caplio RR330 has the higher effective resolution. The Caplio RR330 and Caplio RX were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Caplio RX
Released in 2004, Caplio RX has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 165 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.