CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh Caplio RR120
vs Ricoh Caplio RR230

Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio RR120

Ricoh / 2002

Caplio RR120

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio RR230

Ricoh / 2003

Caplio RR230

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
Caplio RR120
15 mm²
Caplio RR230
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Caplio RR120 and Caplio RR230 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Caplio RR120MetricCaplio RR230
2.2 MPEffective pixels2.11 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor4.5 × 3.37
2.63 µmPixel pitch2.68 µm
6.89 µm²Pixel area7.19 µm²
14.51 MP/cm²Pixel density13.91 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor7.7
—Maximum video—
230 gWeight220 g
SmartMediaStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
4x AABattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Caplio RR120 and Caplio RR230 have the same sensor area. The Caplio RR230 has the lighter body. The Caplio RR120 has the higher effective resolution. The Caplio RR230 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Caplio RR120

Released in 2002, Caplio RR120 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2.2 MP effective resolution, and a 230 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Caplio RR230

Released in 2003, Caplio RR230 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 220 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras