Reasons to choose Caplio GX200
Released in 2008, Caplio GX200 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 12.1 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Ricoh Caplio GX200
vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
VS
Sensor area
42 mm²
Caplio GX20042 mm²
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Caplio GX200 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Caplio GX200MetricGXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
12.1 MPEffective pixels10 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.53 × 5.64
1.87 µmPixel pitch2.06 µm
3.51 µm²Pixel area4.25 µm²
28.49 MP/cm²Pixel density23.55 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.6
—Maximum video—
260 gWeight355 g
Internal storageStorageInternal storage
Lithium-Ion DB-70 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion DB-100 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Caplio GX200 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC have the same sensor area. The Caplio GX200 has the lighter body. The Caplio GX200 has the higher effective resolution. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Released in 2009, GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 355 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.