CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh Caplio G3
vs Ricoh Caplio RR230

Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio G3

Ricoh / 2003

Caplio G3

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio RR230

Ricoh / 2003

Caplio RR230

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Caplio G3
15 mm²
Caplio RR230
Area ratio
1.41:1
Absolute difference
6 mm²
Relative difference
40.6%

The Caplio G3 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Caplio G3MetricCaplio RR230
3.1 MPEffective pixels2.11 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor4.5 × 3.37
2.62 µmPixel pitch2.68 µm
6.88 µm²Pixel area7.19 µm²
14.54 MP/cm²Pixel density13.91 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor7.7
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight220 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)Battery1x CR-V3, 2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Caplio G3 has the larger sensor area. The Caplio G3 has the lighter body. The Caplio G3 has the higher effective resolution. The Caplio G3 and Caplio RR230 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Caplio G3

Released in 2003, Caplio G3 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Caplio RR230

Released in 2003, Caplio RR230 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 220 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras