CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh Caplio 500G
vs Ricoh Caplio RR630

Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio 500G

Ricoh / 2006

Caplio 500G

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio RR630

Ricoh / 2006

Caplio RR630

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Caplio 500G
38 mm²
Caplio RR630
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Caplio 500G and Caplio RR630 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Caplio 500GMetricCaplio RR630
8 MPEffective pixels6 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.18 µmPixel pitch2.51 µm
4.74 µm²Pixel area6.32 µm²
21.11 MP/cm²Pixel density15.83 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
450 gWeight150 g
Internal storageStorageSecure Digital
Lithium-Ion DB-43 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Caplio 500G and Caplio RR630 have the same sensor area. The Caplio RR630 has the lighter body. The Caplio 500G has the higher effective resolution. The Caplio 500G and Caplio RR630 were both released in 2006. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Caplio 500G

Released in 2006, Caplio 500G has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 450 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Caplio RR630

Released in 2006, Caplio RR630 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras