Reasons to choose Digi 30
Released in 2006, Digi 30 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Praktica Digi 30
vs Samsung Digimax 202
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
Digi 3031 mm²
Digimax 202- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Digi 30 and Digimax 202 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Digi 30MetricDigimax 202
3.2 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.1 µmPixel pitch4.02 µm
9.6 µm²Pixel area16.17 µm²
10.42 MP/cm²Pixel density6.18 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
—Weight120 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AAABatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Digi 30 and Digimax 202 have the same sensor area. The Digi 30 has the lighter body. The Digi 30 has the higher effective resolution. The Digi 30 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Digimax 202
Released in 2004, Digimax 202 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.