CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DCZ 8.2
vs Praktica Luxmedia 8403

Archive illustration for Praktica DCZ 8.2

Praktica / 2008

DCZ 8.2

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica Luxmedia 8403

Praktica / 2008

Luxmedia 8403

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DCZ 8.2
25 mm²
Luxmedia 8403
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DCZ 8.2 and Luxmedia 8403 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DCZ 8.2MetricLuxmedia 8403
8 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight110 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DCZ 8.2 and Luxmedia 8403 have the same sensor area. The Luxmedia 8403 has the lighter body. The DCZ 8.2 and Luxmedia 8403 have the same effective resolution. The DCZ 8.2 and Luxmedia 8403 were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DCZ 8.2

Released in 2008, DCZ 8.2 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Luxmedia 8403

Released in 2008, Luxmedia 8403 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras