CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DCZ 2.1 S
vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S80

Archive illustration for Praktica DCZ 2.1 S

Praktica / 2003

DCZ 2.1 S

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S80

Sony / 2005

Cyber-shot DSC-S80

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
DCZ 2.1 S
21 mm²
Cyber-shot DSC-S80
Area ratio
1.41:1
Absolute difference
6 mm²
Relative difference
40.6%

The Cyber-shot DSC-S80 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DCZ 2.1 SMetricCyber-shot DSC-S80
2.11 MPEffective pixels4 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor5.33 × 4
2.68 µmPixel pitch2.31 µm
7.19 µm²Pixel area5.33 µm²
13.91 MP/cm²Pixel density18.76 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight249 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMemory Stick, Memory Stick Pro
1x CR-V3, 2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Cyber-shot DSC-S80 has the larger sensor area. The DCZ 2.1 S has the lighter body. The Cyber-shot DSC-S80 has the higher effective resolution. The Cyber-shot DSC-S80 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DCZ 2.1 S

Released in 2003, DCZ 2.1 S has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Cyber-shot DSC-S80

Released in 2005, Cyber-shot DSC-S80 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 249 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras