Reasons to choose DC Slim 2
Released in 2004, DC Slim 2 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Praktica DC Slim 2
vs Praktica Digi 3 LM
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
DC Slim 231 mm²
Digi 3 LM- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DC Slim 2 and Digi 3 LM have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
DC Slim 2MetricDigi 3 LM
2 MPEffective pixels3.2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.92 µmPixel pitch3.1 µm
15.36 µm²Pixel area9.6 µm²
6.51 MP/cm²Pixel density10.42 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight90 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AAABattery2x AAA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC Slim 2 and Digi 3 LM have the same sensor area. The Digi 3 LM has the lighter body. The Digi 3 LM has the higher effective resolution. The Digi 3 LM is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Digi 3 LM
Released in 2005, Digi 3 LM has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 90 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.