CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Pentax K-m
vs Pentax K10D

Archive illustration for Pentax K-m

Pentax / 2008

K-m

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Pentax K10D

Pentax / 2006

K10D

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

369 mm²
K-m
369 mm²
K10D
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The K-m and K10D have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

K-mMetricK10D
10.2 MPEffective pixels10 MP
23.5 × 15.7Sensor23.5 × 15.7
6.01 µmPixel pitch6.07 µm
36.17 µm²Pixel area36.89 µm²
2.76 MP/cm²Pixel density2.71 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
—Maximum video—
590 gWeight710 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2 x AA Alkaline, Lithium or NiMH BatteriesBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The K-m and K10D have the same sensor area. The K-m has the lighter body. The K-m has the higher effective resolution. The K-m is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose K-m

Released in 2008, K-m has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 590 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose K10D

Released in 2006, K10D has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 710 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras