Reasons to choose Lumix DMC-FS35
Released in 2011, Lumix DMC-FS35 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 159 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS35
vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Lumix DMC-FS3528 mm²
Lumix DMC-FT20- Area ratio
- 1.03:1
- Absolute difference
- 1 mm²
- Relative difference
- 2.6%
The Lumix DMC-FS35 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Lumix DMC-FS35MetricLumix DMC-FT20
16.1 MPEffective pixels16.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.31 µm
1.77 µm²Pixel area1.72 µm²
56.57 MP/cm²Pixel density58.07 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
159 gWeight142 g
SDHC, SDXC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Lumix DMC-FS35 has the larger sensor area. The Lumix DMC-FT20 has the lighter body. The Lumix DMC-FS35 and Lumix DMC-FT20 have the same effective resolution. The Lumix DMC-FT20 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Lumix DMC-FT20
Released in 2012, Lumix DMC-FT20 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 142 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.