CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus FE-350
vs Rollei Flexline 100

Archive illustration for Olympus FE-350

Olympus / 2008

FE-350

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Flexline 100

Rollei / 2010

Flexline 100

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
FE-350
25 mm²
Flexline 100
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The FE-350 and Flexline 100 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

FE-350MetricFlexline 100
8 MPEffective pixels10 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.58 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area2.48 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density40.26 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
178 gWeight107 g
xD Picture cardStoragemicroSDHC
Lithium-Ion (LI-42B) Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The FE-350 and Flexline 100 have the same sensor area. The Flexline 100 has the lighter body. The Flexline 100 has the higher effective resolution. The Flexline 100 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose FE-350

Released in 2008, FE-350 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 178 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Flexline 100

Released in 2010, Flexline 100 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 107 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras