Reasons to choose FE-310
Released in 2008, FE-310 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 122 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Olympus FE-310
vs Rollei Flexline 100
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
FE-31025 mm²
Flexline 100- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The FE-310 and Flexline 100 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
FE-310MetricFlexline 100
8 MPEffective pixels10 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.58 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area2.48 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density40.26 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
122 gWeight107 g
xD Picture cardStoragemicroSDHC
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The FE-310 and Flexline 100 have the same sensor area. The Flexline 100 has the lighter body. The Flexline 100 has the higher effective resolution. The Flexline 100 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Flexline 100
Released in 2010, Flexline 100 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 107 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.