CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus FE-240
vs Sanyo VPC E890

Archive illustration for Olympus FE-240

Olympus / 2007

FE-240

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sanyo VPC E890

Sanyo / 2009

VPC E890

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
FE-240
25 mm²
VPC E890
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The FE-240 and VPC E890 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

FE-240MetricVPC E890
7.1 MPEffective pixels8.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.87 µmPixel pitch1.75 µm
3.5 µm²Pixel area3.07 µm²
28.58 MP/cm²Pixel density32.61 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight—
xD Picture cardStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBattery—

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The FE-240 and VPC E890 have the same sensor area. The VPC E890 has the lighter body. The VPC E890 has the higher effective resolution. The VPC E890 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose FE-240

Released in 2007, FE-240 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7.1 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose VPC E890

Released in 2009, VPC E890 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8.1 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras