CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus FE-200
vs Olympus mju mini Digital S

Archive illustration for Olympus FE-200

Olympus / 2006

FE-200

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus mju mini Digital S

Olympus / 2004

mju mini Digital S

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
FE-200
25 mm²
mju mini Digital S
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The FE-200 and mju mini Digital S have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

FE-200Metricmju mini Digital S
6 MPEffective pixels5.4 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.03 µmPixel pitch2.14 µm
4.14 µm²Pixel area4.6 µm²
24.15 MP/cm²Pixel density21.74 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
155 gWeight115 g
xD Picture cardStoragexD Picture card
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The FE-200 and mju mini Digital S have the same sensor area. The mju mini Digital S has the lighter body. The FE-200 has the higher effective resolution. The FE-200 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose FE-200

Released in 2006, FE-200 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 155 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose mju mini Digital S

Released in 2004, mju mini Digital S has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5.4 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras