CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus E-400
vs Olympus E-450

Archive illustration for Olympus E-400

Olympus / 2006

E-400

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus E-450

Olympus / 2009

E-450

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

225 mm²
E-400
225 mm²
E-450
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The E-400 and E-450 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 3 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

E-400MetricE-450
10 MPEffective pixels10 MP
17.3 × 13Sensor17.3 × 13
4.74 µmPixel pitch4.74 µm
22.49 µm²Pixel area22.49 µm²
4.45 MP/cm²Pixel density4.45 MP/cm²
2Crop factor2
—Maximum video—
435 gWeight426 g
Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture CardStorageCompact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The E-400 and E-450 have the same sensor area. The E-450 has the lighter body. The E-400 and E-450 have the same effective resolution. The E-450 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose E-400

Released in 2006, E-400 has about 225 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 435 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose E-450

Released in 2009, E-450 has about 225 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 426 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras