CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus E-30
vs Olympus E-5

Archive illustration for Olympus E-30

Olympus / 2008

E-30

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus E-5

Olympus / 2010

E-5

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

225 mm²
E-30
225 mm²
E-5
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The E-30 and E-5 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

E-30MetricE-5
12.3 MPEffective pixels12.3 MP
17.3 × 13Sensor17.3 × 13
4.28 µmPixel pitch4.28 µm
18.28 µm²Pixel area18.28 µm²
5.47 MP/cm²Pixel density5.47 MP/cm²
2Crop factor2
—Maximum video—
695 gWeight800 g
Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture CardStorageCompactFlash type I, SDHC, Secure Digital
BLM-1 Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryBLM-5 Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The E-30 and E-5 have the same sensor area. The E-30 has the lighter body. The E-30 and E-5 have the same effective resolution. The E-5 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose E-30

Released in 2008, E-30 has about 225 mm² of sensor area, 12.3 MP effective resolution, and a 695 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose E-5

Released in 2010, E-5 has about 225 mm² of sensor area, 12.3 MP effective resolution, and a 800 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras