CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus E-1
vs Pentax *ist DS2

Archive illustration for Olympus E-1

Olympus / 2003

E-1

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Pentax *ist DS2

Pentax / 2005

*ist DS2

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

225 mm²
E-1
369 mm²
*ist DS2
Area ratio
1.64:1
Absolute difference
144 mm²
Relative difference
64.1%

The *ist DS2 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

E-1Metric*ist DS2
4.9 MPEffective pixels6.1 MP
17.3 × 13Sensor23.5 × 15.7
6.77 µmPixel pitch7.78 µm
45.9 µm²Pixel area60.48 µm²
2.18 MP/cm²Pixel density1.65 MP/cm²
2Crop factor1.53
—Maximum video—
660 gWeight470 g
CompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, MicrodriveStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The *ist DS2 has the larger sensor area. The *ist DS2 has the lighter body. The *ist DS2 has the higher effective resolution. The *ist DS2 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose E-1

Released in 2003, E-1 has about 225 mm² of sensor area, 4.9 MP effective resolution, and a 660 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose *ist DS2

Released in 2005, *ist DS2 has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 470 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras