Reasons to choose D-340R
Released in 1999, D-340R has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Olympus D-340R
vs Olympus E-100 RS
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
D-340R31 mm²
E-100 RS- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The D-340R and E-100 RS have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
D-340RMetricE-100 RS
1.2 MPEffective pixels1.3 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
5.06 µmPixel pitch4.86 µm
25.6 µm²Pixel area23.63 µm²
3.91 MP/cm²Pixel density4.23 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
320 gWeight603 g
SmartMediaStorageSmartMedia
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA NiMH (4) batteries (supplied)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The D-340R and E-100 RS have the same sensor area. The D-340R has the lighter body. The E-100 RS has the higher effective resolution. The E-100 RS is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose E-100 RS
Released in 2000, E-100 RS has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 603 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.