CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus C-740 UZ
vs Olympus D-435

Archive illustration for Olympus C-740 UZ

Olympus / 2003

C-740 UZ

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus D-435

Olympus / 2005

D-435

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
C-740 UZ
25 mm²
D-435
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The C-740 UZ and D-435 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

C-740 UZMetricD-435
3.1 MPEffective pixels5.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.83 µmPixel pitch2.21 µm
8.01 µm²Pixel area4.87 µm²
12.48 MP/cm²Pixel density20.53 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
380 gWeight140 g
xD Picture cardStoragexD Picture Card
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The C-740 UZ and D-435 have the same sensor area. The D-435 has the lighter body. The D-435 has the higher effective resolution. The D-435 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose C-740 UZ

Released in 2003, C-740 UZ has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 380 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D-435

Released in 2005, D-435 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5.1 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras