CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Olympus C-300 Zoom
vs Samsung Digimax 370

Archive illustration for Olympus C-300 Zoom

Olympus / 2002

C-300 Zoom

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax 370

Samsung / 2004

Digimax 370

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
C-300 Zoom
25 mm²
Digimax 370
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The C-300 Zoom and Digimax 370 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

C-300 ZoomMetricDigimax 370
3 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.88 µmPixel pitch2.83 µm
8.28 µm²Pixel area8.01 µm²
12.08 MP/cm²Pixel density12.48 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
332 gWeight144 g
SmartMediaStorageMemory Stick Duo, MultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The C-300 Zoom and Digimax 370 have the same sensor area. The Digimax 370 has the lighter body. The Digimax 370 has the higher effective resolution. The Digimax 370 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose C-300 Zoom

Released in 2002, C-300 Zoom has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3 MP effective resolution, and a 332 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digimax 370

Released in 2004, Digimax 370 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 144 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras