CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix P950
vs Ricoh WG-70

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix P950

Nikon / 2020

Coolpix P950

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh WG-70

Ricoh / 2020

WG-70

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Coolpix P950
28 mm²
WG-70
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Coolpix P950 and WG-70 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Coolpix P950MetricWG-70
16 MPEffective pixels16 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.78 µm²Pixel area1.78 µm²
56.22 MP/cm²Pixel density56.22 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
3,840 × 2,160Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
1,005 gWeight193 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryD-LI92 lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix P950 and WG-70 have the same sensor area. The WG-70 has the lighter body. The Coolpix P950 and WG-70 have the same effective resolution. The Coolpix P950 and WG-70 were both released in 2020. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix P950

Released in 2020, Coolpix P950 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 1,005 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose WG-70

Released in 2020, WG-70 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 193 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras