Reasons to choose E2s
Released in 1996, E2s has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1.4 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Nikon E2s
vs Olympus D-300L
VS
Sensor area
58 mm²
E2s58 mm²
D-300L- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The E2s and D-300L have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
E2sMetricD-300L
1.4 MPEffective pixels0.8 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor8.8 × 6.6
6.44 µmPixel pitch8.52 µm
41.49 µm²Pixel area72.6 µm²
2.41 MP/cm²Pixel density1.38 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
—Weight320 g
—StorageInternal storage
NiMH accuBatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The E2s and D-300L have the same sensor area. The E2s has the lighter body. The E2s has the higher effective resolution. The E2s and D-300L were both released in 1996. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose D-300L
Released in 1996, D-300L has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 0.8 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.