Reasons to choose E2n
Released in 1997, E2n has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1.4 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Nikon E2n
vs Olympus D-600L
VS
Sensor area
58 mm²
E2n58 mm²
D-600L- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The E2n and D-600L have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
E2nMetricD-600L
1.4 MPEffective pixels1.3 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor8.8 × 6.6
6.44 µmPixel pitch6.68 µm
41.49 µm²Pixel area44.68 µm²
2.41 MP/cm²Pixel density2.24 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
—Weight410 g
—StorageSmartMedia
NiMH accuBatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The E2n and D-600L have the same sensor area. The E2n has the lighter body. The E2n has the higher effective resolution. The E2n and D-600L were both released in 1997. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose D-600L
Released in 1997, D-600L has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 410 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.