CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon D3X
vs Nikon D5200

Archive illustration for Nikon D3X

Nikon / 2008

D3X

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon D5200

Nikon / 2012

D5200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

862 mm²
D3X
367 mm²
D5200
Area ratio
2.35:1
Absolute difference
495 mm²
Relative difference
135%

The D3X has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 4 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

D3XMetricD5200
24.5 MPEffective pixels24.1 MP
35.9 × 24Sensor23.5 × 15.6
5.93 µmPixel pitch3.9 µm
35.17 µm²Pixel area15.21 µm²
2.84 MP/cm²Pixel density6.57 MP/cm²
1Crop factor1.53
—Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
1,260 gWeight555 g
Compact Flash (Type I or II) x 2, UDMAStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Lithium-Ion EN-EL4a rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion EN-EL14 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The D3X has the larger sensor area. The D5200 has the lighter body. The D3X has the higher effective resolution. The D5200 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose D3X

Released in 2008, D3X has about 862 mm² of sensor area, 24.5 MP effective resolution, and a 1,260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D5200

Released in 2012, D5200 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 24.1 MP effective resolution, and a 555 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras