CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon D3000
vs Nikon D5200

Archive illustration for Nikon D3000

Nikon / 2009

D3000

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon D5200

Nikon / 2012

D5200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

373 mm²
D3000
367 mm²
D5200
Area ratio
1.02:1
Absolute difference
6 mm²
Relative difference
1.7%

The D3000 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 3 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

D3000MetricD5200
10.2 MPEffective pixels24.1 MP
23.6 × 15.8Sensor23.5 × 15.6
6.05 µmPixel pitch3.9 µm
36.56 µm²Pixel area15.21 µm²
2.74 MP/cm²Pixel density6.57 MP/cm²
1.52Crop factor1.53
—Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
536 gWeight555 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Lithium-Ion EN-EL9a rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion EN-EL14 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The D3000 has the larger sensor area. The D3000 has the lighter body. The D5200 has the higher effective resolution. The D5200 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose D3000

Released in 2009, D3000 has about 373 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 536 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D5200

Released in 2012, D5200 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 24.1 MP effective resolution, and a 555 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras