CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix W300
vs Ricoh WG-50

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix W300

Nikon / 2017

Coolpix W300

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh WG-50

Ricoh / 2017

WG-50

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Coolpix W300
28 mm²
WG-50
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Coolpix W300 and WG-50 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Coolpix W300MetricWG-50
16 MPEffective pixels16 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.78 µm²Pixel area1.78 µm²
56.22 MP/cm²Pixel density56.22 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
3,840 × 2,160Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
231 gWeight193 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
EN-EL12 lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryD-LI92 lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix W300 and WG-50 have the same sensor area. The WG-50 has the lighter body. The Coolpix W300 and WG-50 have the same effective resolution. The Coolpix W300 and WG-50 were both released in 2017. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix W300

Released in 2017, Coolpix W300 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 231 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose WG-50

Released in 2017, WG-50 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 193 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras